Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ann Diamond's avatar

I hesitate about sharing this- but I have decided I will. I'm so sorry but also amazed that you have the strength and clarity to write about it. Of course no blame or guilt can attach to you, especially since you are managing to expose it so eloquently and brilliantly- destroying all doubt in your readers that these things happen in America and elsewhere. But who were the humans or entities running this DUMB and where can they be found today? How do we pull them out of the shadows and send them to hell where they belong?

Expand full comment
Jillionaire's avatar

I was aware of the satan/Saturn/Satanas connection but not that the original Greek meaning of satan is ‘logic’. Also the Hebrew meaning "adversary, one who plots against another." Take a look at what human means. Here are some notes from my Cult of Law files.

We’re Only Human After All – Or Are We?

The following definitions have been sourced the Aetherical Blogspot:

When the compound word hu-man is broken down into its constituent parts “hue” and “man”, it gives us color of man; the appearance as distinguished from that which is real; having the form but not the substance. A living body without spirit is not in the realm of reality. A false image of a man. A human being is therefore the form rather than the substance of man.

Human: Belonging or relative to man as distinguished from God or superhuman beings; pertaining to the sphere or faculties of man (with implication of limitation or inferiority); MUNDANE; SECULAR; often OPPOSED TO DIVINE. Oxford New English Dictionary 1901

Human: Adjective. [Latin Humanus; Heb. Form, species] 3. Profane; not sacred or divine; as a human author. Websters Dictionary 1828

Human Being. From Latin “Humanus”: a lesser/inferior man or woman defined legally as and ANIMAL or MONSTER distinct from the ancient (pre-Vatican) term homo: man. A key rule of law from the 14th century describing a fundamental LEGAL FICTION – that is the NOTION of an inferior man or woman as an animal (as defined by Papal Decree) and therefore not subject to the laws of free men, but the laws of property.

The decision to create a second word for Homo (man) denoting an inferior ‘animal’ man, was crucial to the legal implementation of the Vatican global slave trade from the 14th century – to overcome the questions of legality and morality of the Vatican slave trade. Therefore, unbaptized indigenous populations were legally defined as “humans” and therefore “animals”. Legally, the NAME OF A HUMAN MUST ALWAYS BE IN CAPITALS TO IDENTIFY THAT INDIVIDUAL AS PROPERTY as distinct from a free man. Ex-Jesuit Frank O’Collins provided this definition in 2005.”

So the human being is a being conceived in the mind, a notion, a fiction.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts